🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial move to restrict social networking access for those under 16 is sending ripples internationally. Politicians, child protection groups, and guardians are monitoring intently to see if this approach will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a increasing number of nations are exploring parallel bans.

• The Danish government plans a ban on social media for under-15s, with the PM stating that mobile devices and apps are "stealing our children's youth". The policy could be passed next year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to shield the young from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to confirm the user details of social media users. The media minister have suggested that an Australian-model ban could be "one of the measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has asked the legislature to enact a bill lifting the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a related step, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Dutch government has recommended guardians to prevent their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has passed a advisory motion supporting a ban for minors without a parent decides otherwise is provided. Although it warns of the "habit-forming" nature of these platforms, the move does not enact mandatory rules.

"A clear age barrier is a useful starting point," said a leading parliamentarian behind the initiative.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Stance

For the United Kingdom, the administration has not ruled out a future ban, emphasizing that "no measure is off the table" but insisting any policy must be "based on conclusive evidence".

Earlier, support grew behind a bill to introduce limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately modified. However, the government committed to further research the topic.

Advocacy groups have voiced warnings. A prominent charity established by the family of a teenager who died after being exposed to dangerous platform posts argues that a strict age ban might not improve online safety and could create a "dangerous transition" of harm when users reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the failure of the tech sector to design platforms and apps that are appropriate and age appropriate for young users," commented a influential child protection advocate.

The United States: A State-by-State Approach

Stateside, action is largely happening at the local level against a backdrop of national inaction.

• Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and limits late-night use.
• The state of Florida has passed a measure prohibiting under-14s from joining social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a rule restricting teenagers to a single hour of social media use per day, with additional use needing a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also enacted bills mandating guardian approval for minors to set up social media presences.

Despite bipartisan support and calls from certain politicians to copy Australia's path, a US-wide ban is currently seen as improbable.

Global Outlook

Apart from these regions, additional states are likewise taking action.

• The Malaysian government plans to restrict social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for one major platform to 16.

But, international agencies take a more nuanced stance. A major UN agency has advised that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "could have unintended consequences". The agency highlights that online platforms can be a "critical link" for isolated youth and that government action should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to improve child safeguards.

While this worldwide conversation evolves, the policies of this nation and others show that governments globally are no longer willing to delay for platforms to act voluntarily.